Comments on: Java, Groovy and maybe JavaFX? http://lexecorp.com/2009/04/17/java-groovy-and-maybe-javafx/ Technical & Scientific Software Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:21:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Closer To The Ideal » Blog Archive » Why do we need JavaFX when we have Groovy? http://lexecorp.com/2009/04/17/java-groovy-and-maybe-javafx/#comment-249 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:56:45 +0000 http://lexecorp.com/?p=1652#comment-249 [...] traction: it isn’t needed. Much of what I liked about JavaFX is already present in Groovy. Lexecorp says it expresses what I’m getting at: I wonder whether I will be able to like JavaFX! Have I been spoilt already by Groovy (it does, [...]

]]> By: Alex http://lexecorp.com/2009/04/17/java-groovy-and-maybe-javafx/#comment-228 Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:22:48 +0000 http://lexecorp.com/?p=1652#comment-228 FYI if you want an array, don’t put [] around the sequence but

Use (‘a’..’z')

$ cat each.groovy
(‘a’..’z').each { print “” }

$ groovy each.groovy
<a><b><c><d> … <z>

Alex

]]> By: Groovy and JavaFX, more useful together? « LEXECORP http://lexecorp.com/2009/04/17/java-groovy-and-maybe-javafx/#comment-226 Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:25:02 +0000 http://lexecorp.com/?p=1652#comment-226 [...] you read my words on wishing to “have my cake and eat it“, I should follow that up by creating an alphabetical list in Groovy, and then making use of [...]

]]>